26th
Ecological Psychology and Fodder for Formalisation
I’ve been working with three kinds of frogs (i think) and what may possibly be a sheen of crickets. there’s an occasional fish flop, but I didn’t get the overhead passenger jets.
I can only guess as to any deep stucture that’s going on here but the guesswork is really the point here I suppose.
The frogs themselves are mostly concerned with the landscape and each other. The calls are pretty much bounded by interspecies concerns.
However, the each group are also subject to many of the same environmental concerns as the others and respond somewhat similarly to those conditions. In fact, the cricket sheen is responsive to those same conditions in different ways but I would think would be unaware of the information in the frog calls.
The fish I think are distant enough to be considered ‘uncoupled’. For now we just consider the water alien. I think that in the time scales we’re hearing this in (20minutes of real-time) that’s a safe bet.
But each group (fish included) responds to the local environment in which they all reside. The frogs probably respond similarly to similar conditions, the crickets have their own responses, and the conditions that effect them have an aural signature too, so the soundscape is naturally coordinated.
These interactions afford fodder for formalisation
